To keep away from main different individuals astray, https://fetishbreak.com/ please do not confer with movies using the host title youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a link to invidio.us or one of the associated proxy websites. Lead people to what is good, not to what is dangerous! Just make sure that not to decide on a proxy that is "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its own nonfree software. This manner of referring is probably fail-safe: it could cease to work, however it can probably not start main folks to run nonfree software program. There can also be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that won't overcome the blockage of access via Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you the way I can't reply. I can't surrender to youtube's nonfree software and surveillance. I get pleasure from getting access to the music and video there, however I will not do foolish or desperate things to keep that entry. You should not both! You do not need a particular "platform" to publish an audio or video on the web. You may publish an audio or video file on any net site. Just put the file on the positioning and hyperlink to it as if it were an extraordinary page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored set up of Samsung's ad-blocker, saying that blocking adverts is "interference" with the websites that publicize (and surveil customers by means of advertisements). The advert-blocker is proprietary software program, similar to this system (Google Play) that Google used to deny entry to put in it. I would refuse to have both of them on my pc. Using a nonfree program offers the owner power over you, and Google has exercised that power.

Surveillance

To identify yourself to a Google service is a grave error. - Google shops an inventory of all purchases a consumer has made that in any means mention the person's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this list, but only one purchase at a time. Then that buy disappears from the listing that the person sees. Whether it stays in another checklist, we have no idea, however I'd anticipate Google to answer that query with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, but the motive is irrelevant - because it isn't an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", turns out to have contained a microphone all along - but only just lately began listening.- Google "sanitizes" its total search logs, then publishes them; however it declines to explain the process of "sanitization", and there is evidence that users will be tracked by them.

The article also mentions two-issue authentication, which in and of itself could be a useful approach (although I've read that crackers can now defeat it), however has the flaw of requiring a mobile phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is to not have a mobile phone.

- Gmail was planned from the start as an enormous surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not solely of Gmail customers but of everyone who sends mail to Gmail customers.- Google quietly combined its ad-tracking profiles with its browsing profiles.- Google has found a manner to track most bank card purchases within the US, even these not carried out by way of a cellphone, and correlate that with folks's on-line actions.

Google cannot do both facet to me, since I pay money and don't carry a cell phone, and it does not know what web sites I look at.

- Google Play sends app developers the personal particulars of users that install the app. Merely asking users' "consent" for this is not enough to legitimize that. We know that the majority users have given up on reading just what they are "consenting" to, and the reason is that they're accustomed to being told, "If you want to make use of this service, you need to consent to blah blah blah." To actually protect folks's privateness, we must cease Google (and different corporations) from getting this personal info in the first place!- Google stores a huge amount of data on each person. This will embrace, in addition to the person's search history and promoting profile: - A timeline of the consumer's location all through each day- Data on the utilization of non-Google telephone apps- 'Deleted' emails and recordsdata uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privateness initiative in California. Collecting the many ways Google is involved with US government surveillance, abroad and in the US, amounts to quite a package deal.

Google invitations people to let Google monitor their telephone use, and all internet use of their homes, for an extravagant payment of $20.

This malicious functionality isn't a secondary aspect of a program with some other function; that is the software program's sole objective, and Google says so. But Google says it in a way that encourages most individuals to disregard the main points and remain unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent doesn't legitimize massive surveillance.

Amazon and Google need "sensible" devices to report all activity to them.

In other words, when you've got a "smart" (learn "spy") lightbulb with that proposed characteristic, and inform an Amazon or Google listening system about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off no matter how, it could ship a report to Amazon or Google.

Even at the moment, the only strategy to make "smart" products protected is to ensure they cannot connect to anyone else's systems.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when shops mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and records who purchased what.

I think that the store itself mustn't get this data, which is why I always pay cash and by no means give my name.

*Google faces lawsuit over tracking in apps even when users opted out.*

- Google cuts off accounts for customers that resell Pixel telephones. They lose entry to all of their mail and documents stored in Google servers beneath that account. It ought to be unlawful to put any "terms of service" on a physical product. It should even be illegal to shut an account on a service without letting the user obtain no matter was saved there. These events provide one other cause why schools should by no means ask a student to use a service account linked to the pupil's identify.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have lower off area-fronting, a function used to enable folks in tyrannical international locations to succeed in communication methods which might be banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to carry out particular censorship of Youtube for the federal government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This will assist the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" robotically deletes posted videos in a method copyright law does not require.- YouTube has made personal deals with the copyright industry to censor works which are truthful use. More data.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her access to it, because her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was offered as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn videos from their own non-public accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never trust a distant storage company to keep something however a spare backup copy. Whenever you store that, put your information into an archive and encrypt it so that the company can't tell what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox lawyers received Youtube to take down criticisms of a video published by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The videos had been almost surely honest use, but Youtube decided towards the critics anyway. This reveals how Youtube's common submission to the copyright business constrict's people's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. In fact, it is not the only one, however that isn't any excuse.- Google supports the TPP due to three principally-evil provisions that will benefit Google.- Google has made it in order that Chrome now automatically installs the DRM module. This makes it dangerous for safety researchers in the US to research potential insecurity in Chrome. More info.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust law to what it was earlier than Reagan weakened it. That's the reason Google is using its influence to weaken those who marketing campaign in opposition to this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the facility of Google.

- Google told a reporter in 2011 that web pages with out "+1" buttons would be punished with lower search rankings. When she revealed a story in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.